ABUJA—Anxiety among the 36 ministers-designate heightened, yesterday,
after President Muhammadu Buhari reiterated that the nation’s economy
can not support 36 ministers with portfolios.
The tension among the ministers-designate was also being compounded
by the dithering on the inauguration of the new federal cabinet.
No date has been scheduled for the inauguration of the cabinet, and many of the ministers-designate,
Vanguard gathered, are hanging around Abuja for the call from the Presidency to assume office.
High ranking presidency officials kept mum on when the new cabinet would be inaugurated.
President Buhari, who last week said that some ministers would not
have portfolios, during his visit to India, reiterated that point,
yesterday, as he affirmed that he would not shy away from saying that
the economy cannot support 36 ministers with separate portfolios.
The President’s assertion, however, received mixed reactions from
some former ministers and other political stakeholders, yesterday.
Among those who spoke on the issue were Senate President Bukola
Saraki; the National Publicity Secretary of the Peoples Democratic
Party, PDP, Olisa Metuh; former labour leader, Chief Frank Kokori and
three former ministers, Chief Don Etiebet, Chief Segun Babatope and
Chief Ken Gbagi.
Economy and 36 ministers with portfolios
Speaking when he received the list of confirmed ministerial nominees
from Senator Saraki at a brief ceremony at the Presidential Villa
yesterday, President Buhari said:
“If I can remember, there must be a member from each of the 36
states. That was why I limited the number of my nominees to that number,
36. The Senate worked extremely hard, and they have passed all the
nominees. I think there was some enthusiasm in some parts of the
Presidency today that portfolios were to be given to the 36.
“The constitution certainly said there must be one member of the
cabinet from each of the states, but the constitution did not say I must
have 36 ministries.”
Dismissing speculations in some media outlets on the portfolio to be assigned to the ministers-designate, the President said:
“I think that the economy as I have seen it now since my sitting here
for the last four months, was so much battered. Although some people
are saying I am giving bad publicity and scaring away investors. Any
investor who is interested in investing in Nigeria will want to know
more about the economy more than ourselves.
“But I am confirming to them that we are truthful, that we need them
to come and help us help ourselves by getting in industries,
manufacturing and services. They know our needs. The economy of human
resources, I believe, will make them eventually come and help us. I
assure you that we will follow the constitution and all the 36 will be
sitting in the cabinet as the constitution stipulates.”
Ministers without portfolio not new — Saraki
Speaking to State House Correspondents after his meeting with the
President, Saraki said the designation of ministers without portfolio
was not something entirely new to the nation. His words:
“Well I think before you had ministers of state in the past, I don’t
think there is anything new, there were ministers for special duties
which really didn’t have portfolios. I think the key issue is being in
cabinet, is being part of the government and those that would have the
responsibilities of ministering are those that at the end of the day
would do that.
“We have the challenges of revenue drop, challenges in trying to
boost revenue and create jobs and you know we have some of these issues
which we really need to address.
“I think that it is time for us to address them and these are some of
the issues we looked at as a Senate, that it is time for us to give
support to the executive to move the country forward.”
Asked why he had to deliver the names personally to the President,
Saraki said he had other issues besides presenting the list of ministers
to the President. He, however, robustly denied engaging the President
on his on-going trial at the Code of Conduct Tribunal.
Mixed reactions trail Buhari’s assertion
There was, however, mixed response from some former ministers and
others on the President’s assertion that some ministers would not have
portfolios.
While Etiebet, Metuh and Kokori accepted the President’s stance on
not assigning portfolios to all ministers, describing it as his style,
Babatope said it was not ideal while Gbagi said the measure would not
save any money as envisaged by the President.
Metuh, who again questioned the rationale of the president’s motive in ascribing his action to a battered economy said:
“It is his style, and it is his prerogative. We are not struggling
for space with him, and the constitution does not require him to assign
portfolios to all 36 ministers.”
Chief Etiebet, who served as Minister of Petroleum in the Sani Abacha
regime and until recently a member of the Board of Trustees of the PDP
said:
“There is nothing wrong with Buhari running his government with a
lean cabinet if he can achieve his aims. He is the President and has a
herculean task of saving this country from collapse. I believe the buck
stops on his table and not on any minister’s desk.”
He was supported by erstwhile Secretary-General of the National Union
of Petroleum and Natural Gas Workers, NUPENG, Chief Kokori who said:
“It was like that in the past. In the First Republic, we had
ministers without portfolios. They were like ministers of special
duties. There are so many jobs to be done, and they can be assigned to
do any of them by the President without necessarily having portfolios.
“Buhari knows what he is doing because the rot in the system is not
quantifiable. As it is, we should watch him and see what happens. It
will not be fair to condemn the move without seeing if it will work or
not.”
Former Minister of Transport in the Abacha regime and present member of the PDP BoT, Babatope, however, disagreed saying:
“I think we have much to quarrel with Buhari over what he said. If he
decides to do that, we have to accept it as his style but it is not the
ideal thing. This is not the first time such will happen in Nigeria.
Let us watch and see how it works. It is from watching that we will know
whether he is doing it in the interest of Nigeria or not. We saw this
in the past. For us in the opposition, our duty is to watch so as to
hold the government accountable and we have been doing that in the
interest of Nigeria. If it succeeds, we will give him kudos.”
On his part, former Minister of State for Education, Olorogun Gbagi
said: “I expect his advisers to guide him on this to avoid going
contrary to the positions of the constitution. How will having ministers
without portfolios make any difference on the cost of governance?
Whatever the President decides to do, he should ensure that we have
ministers as stipulated in the constitution because the absence of
ministers is taking a toll on governance.”
Source: Vanguard
0 Comments