The Independent National Electoral Commission (INEC) is in a fix after
the Federal High Court in Abuja ordered the freezing of its accounts
over a N34bn contract, thereby threatening the upcoming elections in
Ekiti and Osun states.
The Court also ordered the deduction of
over N17 billion from the accounts of the electoral body in favour of
Beddings Holdings Ltd (BHL).
Justice John Tsoho granted a
Garnishee Order Nisi on the accounts of INEC in First Bank PLC and UBA
PLC with the Central Bank of Nigeria (CBN) for the sum of N17.2bn.
DAILY
POST reports that a garnishee proceeding, is a judicial process of
execution or enforcement of monetary judgment whereby money belonging to
a judgment debtor, in the hands or possession of a third party known as
the ‘Garnishee’ (usually a bank), is attached or seized by a judgment
creditor.
According to the court documents, Beddings Holdings
Ltd.’s ex parte application, in suit number FHC/ABJ/CS/492/2018, was
awarded the garnishee on an earlier judgement by former Chief Judge of
the court, Justice Ibrahim Auta.
Justice Auta’s judgement
delivered on January 28, 2014 was in respect of a contract for supply of
Direct Data Capture (DDC) machines, Electronic Collapsible Transparent
Ballot Boxes (ECTBB) and Proof Address System/Scheme (PASS) worth N34.5
billion for the 2010 voters’ registration.
Bedding Holdings had
approached the court challenging INEC’s decision to give the contract to
three companies – Zinox Technologies, Avante International and Haier
Electrical Appliances, saying the decision had violated its patent
right.
Joined in the suit with number FHC/ABJ/CS/816/2010 were INEC,
the Attorney General of the Federation and the three companies that
secured the contract.
The company urged the court to compel INEC
to pay it half of the total contract sum amounting N17.2 billion as
compensation for infringing on its valid and subsisting patent right.
The
court agreed that with the total evidence provided by the parties in
the case BHL owned a subsisting patent right over the process,
application and the use of the DCC machines.
The court, therefore, ordered the then INEC chairman, Prof. Attahiru Jega, to pay the compensation to the patent holder.
But
INEC filed an appeal before the Court of Appeal in Abuja in 2014,
challenging the judgement of the Federal High Court which awarded the
compensation.
INEC is insisting at the Appeal Court with appeal
number: CA/132A/2014 that BHL is not the sole patent owner of the
election equipment.
It is also challenging the way and manner BHL
rushed and secured the patent right from the Federal Ministry of
Commerce within two weeks, even though the process takes months to
accomplish.
The case is still pending at the Appeal Court when the ex parte order for the Garnishee Order Nisi was granted last month.
0 Comments