THE possibility of yet another round of systemic failure in the banking
industry, raised recently by the Nigerian Deposit Insurance Corporation,
calls for quick, concerted pre-emptive action. The revelation by Umaru
Ibrahim, managing director of the NDIC, that weak corporate governance
and internal controls were tipping the financial sector towards crisis
conflated with a similar alarm raised by the International Monetary Fund
anchored on weak regulation and adverse operating conditions. With the
economy falling short of growth projections, urgent, extraordinary
measures should be adopted today to prevent a catastrophe.
Umaru
could not mask his apprehension in an address presented on his behalf at
the FITC discussion programme in Lagos: despite stringent and elaborate
rules, weak corporate governance culture had rebounded in the banking
system and, along with ineffectual controls, presented regulators with
the possibility of bank failures. For regulators, he said the fear had
prompted moves to conduct tests and moves to stave off adversity.
Earlier
in March and April this year, the IMF had issued concerns over
Nigeria’s continued vulnerability to shocks amid a slow exit from
recession, rising debts and its ability to withstand the aftershocks of
another global meltdown predicted by leading experts.
Ibrahim’s
alert confirmed the long-running fears of systemic upheaval in the
banking sector, which barely survived the shocks of 2007-2009 and only
after a decisive intervention by the leadership of the Central Bank of
Nigeria that prevented failure. The IMF has identified weak regulation
as a critical factor in the last few years. In what some see as
self-indictment, Godwin Emefiele, the CBN Governor, recently took to
warning the deposit money banks of sanctions for round tripping and
other sharp practices in the foreign exchange market. The recourse to
sermons and warnings demonstrates the crisis of regulation that has for
long plagued the country’s financial system. The CBN is armed with
enough legal powers to monitor and sanction abuses and misdemeanours by
bankers. Lamido Sanusi, as governor (2008 to 2014), proved this when,
after stress tests, the central bank removed the boards and managements
of eight banks, appointed interim replacements that nursed them until
they recovered and were bought by new investors. Sanusi also identified
gross insider abuse by directors and managers for the crisis.
Apparently,
as the CBN itself has acknowledged, insider abuse is back; sharp
practices in the forex market partly blamed for the collapse of 44 banks
between 1994 and 2000; money laundering and violation for reporting
regulations, as well as false accounting have taken hold in the DMBs.
Can
Emefiele prevent systemic distress? Doing so requires, above all else,
courage and astuteness. It was the frequent recourse to the CBN’s
overnight lending window that alerted Sanusi to the stress in some banks
in 2009. In 2017, the bank said, 60 per cent of the average daily
N216.34 billion the DMBs borrowed from its Standing Lending Facility was
for Intra-Day Lending Facility.
Reports, evidence and
testimonies in corruption trials have detailed how regulations and
anti-money laundering laws were brazenly violated by bankers to assist
high profile public figures loot and hide public funds. These
disclosures should have prompted audits, fines and, where necessary,
severe sanctions on complicit banks, directors and managers, some of
whom have testified to their involvement in court.
The CBN needs
to act fast as most Nigerian banks, post-consolidation, are big and a
failing one could pull down others. While inefficient banks may go bust
in good times without threatening the entire system, an economy that
grew only 1.9 per cent in the first quarter of this year, just two
quarters separated from a recession, suffered nine million job losses in
three years and, with youth unemployment of over 20 per cent, should
avoid systemic bank failure. This principle was applied during the
2007/8 meltdown when the United States Treasury gave an initial $700
billion to save some big banks, Italy €17 billion and Britain £500
billion.
The CBN and NDIC should immediately undertake full
audits and examinations of the banks; there should be no hesitation to
use their considerable powers to remove errant boards and executives.
Fraud cases rose by 56.3 per cent in 2017, according to the NDIC, while
the CBN stress tests in the same year found rising cases of insider
abuse with directors accounting for 40 per cent of the N2.4 trillion
non-performing loans in the industry. Emefiele’s CBN should explain why
such directors are still in the system and why banks have persistently
exceeded the specified five per cent NPLs ratio without serious
sanctions. Elsewhere, Germany’s Deutshe Bank was slammed $14 billion by
regulators in the US and Europe; by early this year, the world’s top 20
banks, according to a Guardian of London report, had been hit with £252
billion in fines and penalties combined over five years for various
violations.
The top priority is to protect customers: the CBN
should be proactive and reform itself for efficient monitoring in real
time, applying the latest technology tools to weed out corrupt officials
that collude with errant bankers. It should wield the big stick and
avoid favouritism.
Our banks are not fulfilling the critical role
of financial intermediation partly because the operating environment is
dominated by government funds, which fuel corruption, rent-taking and
rule-breaking while squeezing out the private sector. The government
should take the sensible approach of rolling out practical, sustainable
policies of privatisation, liberalisation and export promotion to
stimulate start-ups, SMEs and massive investment in agriculture,
construction, transportation – rail, water and aviation – as well as
mining and manufacturing. The financial system will become more
efficient when DMBs rely more on private sector funds and less on public
sector funds and forex, two toxic streams that have derailed banks from
their traditional roles in Nigeria.
0 Comments