By Christian MmadubuoguHow do you trust a person that leads you
out of the desert but ends up dropping you in the middle of the sea? How
do you trust a system that promised an ‘easy peasy’ banking experience
but ends up fagging you out with incessant technical hitches and
excuses? How do you trust a government’s idiosyncrasy of the ‘change’
homily while it continues to maintain the status quo of ‘business as
usual’ How do you reconcile the regulatory deficiencies that leave the
citizenry confused and doubtful?
A thousand ‘hows and whys’ yet
no answer or even an attempt at amelioration. The level of public
confidence in banks operating in Nigeria is fast dissipating and not
such that can guarantee effective customer patronage of inter-bank
payments.
According to media reports, Point of Sale (PoS)
transaction failure hit an all-time high in March, with a leading
commercial bank recording about 30,000 failure in one day on its
platform. Though transactions via the PoS had not heretofore been great,
it further deteriorated from October last year.
The general
belief is that banks are failing Nigerians. Ask an average Nigerian what
he thinks, and he would tell you that the internet services banks
promised to make for a happy and less stressful experience, is now the
bane that he contends with.
The truth that the people have yet to
grasp is that the failings of the electronic transfer system is out of
the hands of the banks. The main culprit is the Nigeria Interbank
Settlement System (NIBSS).
When all Licenced banks through the
Central Bank of Nigeria decided that it was pertinent to provide a
single settlement window, they set up NIBSS in 1993 but it was not until
1994 that it kicked off. Life was easy and people were happy until same
apex bank decided yet again that NIBSS deserved to be overloaded. NIBSS
in 2011 accepted the burden of biting off more than it can chew by
adding electronic fund transfers to the settlement system they already
handle and called it NIBSS Instant Payments (NIP).
NIBSS may be a
phenomenon — the preferred option – in the aspect of the settlement, a
darling of the financial sector on properness and timeliness of checks
and balances, but NIP is a total flop and among the growing number of
the service’s 28.5 million customers (Jan-June 2018), backlash is
brewing. The system has repeatedly fallen and is still falling short of
expectations, and annoyingly, they make excuses every time. When people
decried the interminable error messages which were responses to failed
transactions during the June Salah holiday, NIBSS blamed their
incompetence on technical difficulties.
When the Federal
Competition and Consumer Protection Bill was finally passed into law to
consolidate the 2014 Act, hope rose for Nigerians. Consumers were
excited to have a government that stands behind them and the business
savvy lot were encouraged to succeed even in the saturated market space.
Amongst others, the Act proscribes unfair business practices or abuse
of dominant market position by any company, as well as any agreement to
restrain competition, and to put a check on the aforementioned, a
commission was set up. The Act mandates the Federal Competition and
Consumer Prohibition Commission (FCCPC) to administer the regulation.
But for the government to now play conflicting roles of both a player
(NIBSS/NIP) and a regulator (CBN), it shows that there is not only
market failure but also government failure.
The question
is ‘who regulates the regulator?’ FCCPC – regulator – CBN (pioneers of
NIBSS) – regulator – This is a case of an intervener’s shortcomings more
or less approximating or exceeding the market imperfection.
Ideally,
one of the chief roles of government, particularly government embedded
in a highly commercial culture, is to serve as a dispassionate
go-between for settling contingencies about veridical claims in the
marketplace. But government today has so many stakes in the outcome of
so much enterprise that they do not care about the murmurs of the
end-users.
NIBSS has been and is still proving themselves
incapable of handling the instant payment system. The woman who rushes
to the mall to buy food for her home and unable to pay with the PoS; the
student who takes a bike to an ATM and unable to pay the motorcyclist
from inability to make withdrawals, the company whose employees start to
lose faith in because they failed to pay salaries as a result of
malfunctioning e-payment channels and a host of other end users are fed
up with the system. It is either they stop with the whole attempt now
and face that which they are good at – settlement – or God help
Nigerians who may have been led out of the desert only to be dropped off
in the middle of the sea. The heart-breaking part would be if they
cannot swim
0 Comments