Chief Olabode George, the Atona Oodua Of Yorubaland, is a former Deputy
National Chairman of the Peoples Democratic Party (PDP). In this
interview with TEMIDAYO AKINSUYI, he speaks on the state of the nation,
new Ministers and portfolio, as well as solution to Nigeria’s security
challenge. Excerpts:
President Muhammadu Buhari last week
inaugurated his cabinet but he has come under severe criticisms for
asking Ministers who want to meet him to go through Abba Kyari, his
Chief of Staff. Do you think Mr. President is right?
My take is
this: there is a saying that different stroke for different times. Maybe
that is the methodology the President wants to adopt. During the era
PDP was in power, the way we operated when we were in government,
ministers have direct access to the President because as executive
president, he appointed them and entrusted the running of such strategic
ministries to them to manage. If he now decides to have a clearing
house or choke-point, to me personally, that will delay decision making.
As a Minister, when you go to the President, you have discussions with
him on the challenges you are facing in your ministry and if you need
his assistance in one way or the other, you can tell him immediately.
That is the way we operated.
There is no legality about it so if
the President thinks that is the best style he wants to adopt, I wish
him the best because this will greatly delay decision making. There is
no time to fritter away now in Nigeria. Every minutes matters a lot in
governance because the people are hungry and they are therefore very
angry. That is one major issue.
As a leader, you fast-track
decision making but when you are mandated to see the Chief of Staff
before seeing the President, it means you have to first take your case
to the Chief of Staff before he now takes it to the President.
Don’t
forget, he is also human and he has his duties already. He is
responsible for the daily programmes and activities of the President, in
terms of his timing and arrangement so that there is no collision of
events.
If a Minister wants to see the President, he should go
straight, see him and take quick decisions. The whole thing will slow
down governance and that to me will not be in the interest of Nigerians.
On our part, we are still hoping in our party that maybe the Tribunal
will be quite favourable to us and our mode of operation will be very
different, effective and impacting on the lives and minds of Nigerians.
There is too much suffering in the land. The President himself said
Nigerians are hungry and he is now putting roadblock on the way of the
Ministers; that to me is worrisome. How many ministers can that man
(Kyari) attend to in a day? I wish us the best under this
administration.
The President also created new Ministries and
also removed Power Ministry from the portfolios of Babatunde Fashola. Do
you think this is a good move?
Like I just said, I am not a
member of their party. As a Nigerian, my prayer is that whatever
methodology the President wants to adopt, that is his prerogative as
long he is acting within the laws of this nation. The taste of a pudding
is actually in eating it. We saw the last four years of the current
administration. To me, it was a charade. The next four years, we are
waiting. However, as a Nigerian, we pray for whoever is in authority.
That is what God told us to do in Romans 12. But when it comes to PDP,
as a party leader, we will reserve our comment till the last year of his
government. But now, we are still hoping that the court will give us
judgment and that they will be fair and honest. If we get there, we know
what to do. But since President Buhari is still there, there should be
no vacuum. If we didn’t win in court, we will allow them to keep
running. We will only interject when the thing gets too unbearable.
Also, the last year of his governance will be time for politics and we
in the PDP will come out massively.
What is your reaction to the
attack on former Deputy Senate President, Ike Ekweremadu by members of
the Indigenous People of Biafra (IPOB) in Nuremberg Germany?
One,
as a Nigerian, I feel very sad. If you have a family feud,
traditionally in an African setting, you don’t take your mess to the
market place. I don’t want to go into details what Ekweremadu or IPOB
members did, but this is a nation that is blessed with many resources,
both human and material. If they have a grudge, there are better ways of
addressing issue. What happened in Germany lowers our respectability in
the civilised world. From that angle, they could have been a bit calmer
in a foreign land. I don’t know the kind of news that will spread in
Germany. They will say look at Nigerians. If you remember, Nuremberg is
the place where they had the trials of the Nazi Generals. My take is
that the IPOB members could have expressed their anger through words.
They could have told him to his face that they are not happy with what
is going on at home but to resort to hounding, hitting and tearing the
cloth of a former Deputy Senate President is uncalled for. I want to
appeal to them and everybody that we should please tone down because we
are getting to the precipice. Violence will never resolve any problem,
it is dialogue. That was why I had suggested on several occasion that
this government must intentionally call for a national dialogue.
Everybody is heading in different direction and that is not good for the
cohesion of our nation. A divided house is a defeated house. I am happy
that the President accepted that there is hunger in the land and he
said that to the new Ministers. How do you resolve it? What about the
security of lives and property? Every day, we hear unpleasant news. It
is either one policeman is killed here or some civilians are killed or
kidnapped. That is enough to call for a national dialogue. As a
democratic nation, if things are heating up this way, it means there is a
need for a dialogue to be chaired by the President. The solution to the
problems in this country cannot be resolved by one man. It has to be a
collective responsibility. That is what we in PDP will do as a party. We
need to call ourselves together and resolve all those grey areas where
people are pontificating on. The gulf between the tribes, rather than
closing up is getting wider by the hour. We need to resolve this
amicably, sensibly and with the love for all our people.
You are
advocating for a national dialogue, what about the 2014 national
conference that the current administration has refused to implement but
kept in the archives?
What I am talking about when I said
national dialogue, I am not extending it to the whole gamut of our
problems. There is one major cancer ravaging this country today and that
is the insecurity of lives and property. They keep talking of herdsmen
attacks in the South but what about Zamfara, Plateau, Taraba, Kaduna and
other places in the North? So, it is no longer a Southern issue, it is a
national malady going on. For me, the issues discussed at the national
confab are the detailed way by which Nigeria should be managed. The 2014
confab report is a much bigger issue, this discussion or dialogue will
be centred mainly on how to effectively secure this nation. The national
conference took months, this one I am advocating is like a National
Town Hall meeting which can be done in a day or two. All over Nigeria,
people will be represented; from governors, youths, traditional rulers,
clerics, market women and so on. It will be televised for all Nigerians
to see. People will say what they are experiencing in their locality and
the President will listen to them and decisions that can be taken will
be taken on the spot; otherwise the Ministers at the meeting will know
the areas that concern them. That is how we used to run the traditional
African setting. When there is a crisis in the village, the king will
send the traditional rulers and invite everyone to a meeting where the
issues will be discussed. We can’t say because we are now in a civilised
world, we now jettison that method. A lot needs to be done in the area
of security in this country.
What is your take on calls for creation of states police as a panacea to the security challenges?
I
believe there is an urgent need to start state policing in the country.
Let every state go and look for the best way to manage the security
issues in their domain. We copy the American constitution. Why did we
half-copy it in the area of security? In America, we have County Police,
State Police and the FBI. Everybody knows what level they are; once a
situation passes a level, the other takes over. Why can’t we do that
here to be effective? Policing is local. In every community, if the
police there are from that community, they will be very effective
because you will know them and they know you. If they see any strange
fellow hanging around, they ask questions. Employ the locals as
policemen to secure their neighbourhood but their activities will be
detailed. Once something is more than what they can do, the national
police take over the place. It will be very effective at least for
maintaining peace and order in a community. Maybe this can be adopted
during the national town hall meeting because people will proffer
solutions. We have just 334,000 policemen in Nigeria for 200,000 people.
How can they effectively secure the people? It is not possible. What
are the functions of the military versus the police? I know that there
is an operation we call ‘Aid to Civil Power’ in the military. Once there
is an insurgency and the Police can no longer cope, they go back to the
Inspector-General of Police (IGP). The IGP in turn will go to the
Commander-in- Chief and tell him ‘ Mr. President, we can no longer cope,
we need the support of the military. It is the Commander-in- Chief who
can deploy troops. Once he does that, there is a process of taking over
and handing over. It is a short therapy to support the civil power. But
today, what are we witnessing? People will go for operation and they are
shot like we witnessed recently in Taraba. What the hell is going on?
There is a need for an urgent national town hall meeting where the issue
of security of this nation must be discussed.
There is this
belief that the PDP as the country’s major opposition party is not
providing the much –needed opposition to keep the APC on its toes. Do
you agree with that ?
I have heard this severally everywhere I
go. I want to believe that maybe it is because we are still waiting for
the outcome of the Tribunal. We are still in the Court of Appeal. They
just submitted their final briefs now to the court. I hope very soon
they give a judgment and if we win, we know what to do as a party. But
either way it goes, the case will still end up in the Supreme Court. So,
let us wait until that exercise is over. I think that is one of the
reasons why the PDP is not doing much in terms of criticising the
government. We are so convinced that PDP won the election fair and
square. Of course, politics is very dynamic and I am sure the managers
of the party are also managing the other entire crises in other places.
You can see some fly by night, fair weather politicians. Immediately
INEC announced that we lost the election, they jumped ship to APC. If by
tomorrow the court declares PDP as the winner, they jump out of APC to
PDP. So we need to be careful and see those who are loyal to the cause
of the party. I believe the outcome of the Tribunal is what is slowing
us down because what is the essence of wasting all your salvos when you
know the tenure of the present government may be temporary?
0 Comments