Former Vice President, Atiku Abubakar, has thrown his weight behind the
setting up of community, state and zonal policing to complement federal
policing.
In a statement on Sunday by his media adviser, Paul
Ibe, the ex-Vice President emphasised that the primary responsibility of
government at all levels is the protection of lives and property of the
citizens, as enshrined in the constitution.
Atiku’s statement is
coming on the heels of controversy over the setting up of a joint
security outfit, Amotekun, by governors of the six states in the
Southwest.
“In carrying out this function, the state employs
different layers of measures to ensure effective and efficient policing.
It is without doubt that in the past decade particularly, the current
policing administration in our dear country had been stretched to its
limits and it is obvious that the reality of our domestic security
upheaval will demand of us to recalibrate our police systems.
“In
the First Republic, before we gravitated too much to the centre,
policing was done federally with each native authority and region having
some mechanisms to deal with little upsets that were the security
concerns of those times.
“In the present day Nigeria, there is
hardly any state of the federation that does not contend with some type
of security challenges.
“Because our security challenges are
diverse in forms and impacts, it is thus incumbent that centrally
controlled police architecture cannot exclusively deal with those
challenges.
Consequently, there is need for the creation of
additional policing structures in the country to address the rapidly
growing challenges of insecurity and crime”, Atiku said.
According
to him, the time is ripe to seriously confront the reality of
insecurity in the country by addressing the urgency of introducing state
police, zonal police and community policing to complement the efforts
of the current federal police.
He added that it’s obvious that
current levels of insecurity in the country are giving rise to major
initiatives such as Amotekun and the issue need not be controversial in
the first place.
Atiku argued that the police are likely to be
more effective if they constantly operate in the same local community or
local government because such closeness might create a bond with the
local people, thereby enabling community cooperation and participation
that would engender proactive outcomes in crime prevention.
Continuing,
he said, “Nigeria is a vast country facing enormous security challenges
and, therefore, there is the urgent need to create more security
structures at the local levels to reduce the burden on the federal
police.
“The issue of security shouldn’t be politicised and
monopolised in the face of our current alarming security challenges
characterised by the fear of even travelling on our highways by the
citizens who might be intercepted by kidnappers and taken hostage for
ransom.
“Local policing shouldn’t be mistaken for an effort to
hijack the role of the federal police or a competition with the federal
government.
Read Also: Amotekun: FG should swallow their pride – Tiv leader
“The
obvious inadequacies of the federal police to effectively deal with
these rapidly growing security challenges make local policing not only
desirable, but also necessary.
“The police are more likely to be
effective in areas where they are well known and trusted by the local
communities who in turn are willing to share information about known
criminals and criminal activities, thereby foiling those crimes before
they are even carried out.
“It is a given perception that when
people have a role in their own security, they are going to help to
defeat the criminal in their tracks and that the more they are involved,
the more likely they would perceive the police as their friends”.
Atiku
however canvassed a reduction of states and local governments to
peripheral players in security matters in the envisaged new policing
order.
He stated further that when local police structures are
closest to the grassroots, emergency response will be more effective
than the current unwieldy chain of command that renders local government
chairmen ineffective when their people are under attacks.
“As a
matter of fact, it is refusing to adopt new ways of doing things that
poses a threat to the unity of the country. It has never been this bad
to the extent of threatening the unity of the country”, he added.
0 Comments