Committee on the Review of the Kwara state Government Properties from
1999 to 2019 on Sunday said more properties and houses will soon be
revoked and others demolished based on its recommendations to the state
government.
The committee added that the late Dr Olusola Saraki’s
house is one of those properties (Ile Arugbo) illegally acquired and
recommended to the state government for acquisition.
The committee said it submitted its report in July last year.
The
committee chair Senator Suleiman Ajadi said his committee also
recommended to government to acquire some properties and pay
compensation to their owners where required.
He described as
false the claims that the government demolished a building belonging to
the late politician Senator Olusola Saraki.
The committee
wondered how a place bordering a hospital could be used for political
meetings where noise and commotion were rife.
Senator Ajadi said that the controversy over the reclamation of the land bordering the civil service clinic.
He
added that the furore was needless because the the state government has
only recovered a property that originally belonged to it but was
unlawfully diverted for private use.
Flanked by some members of the committee, Ajadi told reporters in Ilorin, the state capital.
He
added that many of the publications on the land were either erroneous
or mischievous as there are no proofs anywhere that the land ever
belongs to Asa Investment Limited.
Said he: “The issue of the
land in question came under the terms of reference of this committee
which considered several other properties of government and submitted
its recommendations in July 2019.
“As was the case with all the
properties looked into by the committee, the committee’s recommendations
were based on strictly available records from the archives of
government.
And based on the available records, the Committee did
not see proof of any payments nor an approved Right of Occupancy even
though there was a letter of allocation in principle.
“In
reaching its conclusions, the Committee noted foundation work with
erected columns at varying areas of the larger segment of the land.
The
committee also noted that the land in question was also a part of a
larger parcel of land, part of which has been developed into the Civil
Service Clinic and Secretariat complex now housing the State Ministry of
Finance, among others.
“Finally, based on the existing
convention that land acquired by Government in overriding public
interest cannot be converted to private use, unless under extraneous
circumstances which requires the express approval of the Governor of the
State, the Committee did not see a case made for this land and neither
was there any approval from the Governor of the state to convert it to
private use.
In view of the above reasons, therefore, the
committee was compelled to recommend that the land be repossessed and
put to the original use it was meant for.
He added: “let me draw
the attention of Nigerians to the use of “ile arugbo” to describe the
land in question. Usage of that phrase leads to many people erroneously
thinking of a structured building where old people were catered for.
This
is not so. What was on the ground up until the physical reclamation by
the government was a garage-like structure (a shed) used by the older
Saraki to keep people waiting to see him or to hold political meetings.
“In
addition, it is important to discuss the issue of ownership which
should be central to the whole debate. With emphasis, from all records
available, there is no “Right of Occupancy” or “Certificate of
Occupancy” available to the private firm to which the land was allocated
in principle.
There also no receipt of payments for the land. Where, therefore, is the right to a claim to this land?
“Another
issue of note is the absurdity of putting a political gathering place
beside a (medical) clinic. An hospital is supposed to be a serene
environment for medical welfare of patients; it is definitely not a
political war centre where people make the loudest noise, fight, or find
themselves enmeshed in commotion and fatal stampede etc which was the
lot of that place.
“I, therefore, on behalf of all of my
committee members, some of whom are present here today, believe it was
necessary and prudent to make this public clarification on an issue that
has generated needless controversy.”
0 Comments